Michael Fabricant MPPortcullis
 

In The House
Search My Website

Home Page
News
speeches & articles
Speeches
Publications
Westminster Life
Engineering Articles
personal
Contact
Gallery
Links
Lichfield Links
Conservative Web Site

print in user 
friendly format

   

News Release

18th June 2008

FORMAL COMPLAINT LODGED ON ECO TOWN ADVERT

Michael Fabricant has expressed his delight that Lichfield District Council has lodged a formal complaint against the Department of Communities and Local Government for a misleading advertisement promoting the proposed eco-town at Curborough. Meanwhile, Michael has received a formal answer to his Parliamentary Question asking how much the taxpayer has had to pay out to promote eco-towns.

The Parliamentary Question and Answer follow:-

Michael Fabricant: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much her Department spent on the promotional campaign Can Eco-towns be a Good Housing Solution (a) in total and (b) featuring Curborough, Staffordshire.

Caroline Flint [Minister of Housing]: Exact costs for the advertorials entitled: 'Can Eco-towns be a Good Housing Solution' are still to be finalised. However, we expect to spend approximately £53,000 in total for this series and I can confirm that the cost of buying media space for the Curborough advertorial was £1,250.64.

These advertorials encourage individuals in areas near potential eco-town locations to participate in the current period of consultation, which Government have a duty to support.

Michael is still awaiting a reply to a further question asking what steps her department will take "to set the record straight regarding her misleading advertisement".

The complaint lodged with the Advertising Standards Authority refers to a full page colour advertisement placed in the Lichfield Mercury newspaper on June 5th. The complainant is Richard King of Lichfield District Council. The complaint states:

The advertisement provides misleading information namely:

1) It is claimed that the proposed site for an Eco-town at Curborough is brownfield (previously developed land). The site in fact comprises substantially of greenfield, previously undeveloped.

2) It is claimed that the development site is a former Airfield. This too is incorrect. The proposed development of an Eco-town, if permitted, would involve land adjacent to the former Fradley which serves as a location for employment opportunities.

3) It is claimed that up to 50% of the houses within the Eco-town will be 'affordable'. The actual proportion will not be determined until a detailed proposal is formulated. This has not been done as yet, and in any event Government guidance indicates that the proportion could be anywhere between 30-50%.


© Copyright Michael Fabricant MP & Solnet Systems Ltd. All rights reserved.