Michael Fabricant MPPortcullis
 

In The House
Search My Website

Home Page
News
speeches & articles
Speeches
Publications
Westminster Life
Engineering Articles
personal
Contact
Gallery
Links
Lichfield Links
Conservative Web Site

print in user 
friendly format

   

News Release

17th January 2003

STATEMENT ON IRAQ (2)

I believe that the Prime Minister is right to maintain that action must be taken to deal with the growing threat posed by the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction manufactured in Iraq and elsewhere. But with regard to Iraq, questions in particular remain concerning the 'accurate, full, and complete' declaration of weapons capabilities provided by Iraq to the UN on 7 December [as required under op. Para. 3 of Resolution 1441]. The Head of the UN Inspectors, Hans Blix, has already stated that this documentation contains 'gaps'. The relevant part of the UN Resolution states:

'False statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations.'

However, no final decision has yet been taken and my support for Tony Blair on this issue is not unconditional.

It is highly desirable that we obtain a second UN Resolution before military action is authorised, should Iraq not comply with her UN obligations. However, unlike the Liberal Democrats and certain Labour Cabinet members, I believe it would be unwise for Britain to rule out military action if a second UN Resolution is not obtained. This could arise, for example, if just one member of the UN Security Council were to apply a veto.

There is a precedent for this. When Britain acted to free the people of Kosovo, Russia would never have agreed to support UN action. In that case Britain joined a coalition to free the nation's people from terror. It would be worrying if Britain could not take such action again.

Nor do I agree that a second resolution is necessary under international law. This is not the case. The existing UN Resolution 1441 states that the UN has repeatedly warned Iraq it would 'face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations' [Para. 13], and that Resolution 1441 is 'a final opportunity' for Iraq 'to comply with its disarmament obligations' [Para. 12].

I can only hope that with the massive build up of troops on Iraq's border, Saddam Hussein and his cruel Government will see sense and may decide to leave the country so liberating their people and making war unnecessary.


© Copyright Michael Fabricant MP & Solnet Systems Ltd. All rights reserved.